![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUzWcVDa7wM-9YQU2spgq8NVOHjRpABg-t47MBBruE9djpFUbxUdGo-hKsKGKPmU2F4SrrNEN8Q-U7pP1ZxA8T1iy26cEi2XBI4EvI7DnLMlm-W6GIU-HiuTZ0F8g2AukC1gm7tNeCTK3l/s200/Crumlin+Road+Gaol-Girdwood+Barracks+Aerial.jpg)
An Roisin Dubh
Why do we have the walls? Initially the walls were erected to prevent access to communities by armed groups at the height of the conflict. They restricted the movement of vehicles entering or exiting the community. They created a sense of relative safety at the time, growing into a type of comfort zone. This allowed a type of apartheid living arrangement that segregated and divided communities for the past forty years. Day to day living could go on without having to engage with anyone on the opposite side of the wall.
As the conflict changed, the walls became the focal point for community clashes during periods of community tension such as during the 1981 Hunger Strike, Drumcree & the Holy Cross Blockade. Since the 1994 ceasefires the violence at the interfaces has ceased to be any longer an inter-communal conflict and has become a problem of youth based anti-social activity.
The walls allow a sectarian mindset to go unchanged, drawing young people to them to organise rioting as a type of boredom relief, an adrenalin buzz with no sense of consequence. The walls are often the target for attack and residents living there are left to endure the consequences. Therefore the walls do not prevent trouble.
There is an adage that good walls make good neighbours and while in
There is often reference made to the scars and the legacy of the conflict and the miles of corrugated steel and concrete are perhaps the most visible residue of the past. The Good Friday Agreement is ten years old and we have seen a period of relative peace along with the associated dividend of regeneration and economic development come to the centre of the city and the suburbs. This new sense of urgency to build, shape and change the image of
Walls themselves are neutral, inanimate structures, they hold no politics, intent or opinion but the use of a wall to separate, to divide, to partition and to control is laden with the politics of its architect. Through history the role of the wall has changed from that of protection, keeping out the roaming horde, to signifying dominance, the Norman castle declaring military and technological superiority to the landscape, and the present incarnation of the wall as a tool of the state to divide, police and control.
If